Assisted Suicide
Assisted Suicide – Statement for the Catholic Press from Archbishop Smith. Very many people of all faiths and none will be concerned about a Bill to legalise Assisted Suicide in England and Wales which will be debated in the House of Commons on 11th September 2015. This private members Bill, introduced by Rob Marris MP, will have a free vote and it is important that people make their views known to their own MP ahead of this extremely important debate. I strongly urge all Catholics to contact their own MP as soon as possible to express their concern about the dangerous impact which such a Bill would have on the most vulnerable people. MPs do listen to their own constituents. What is needed is more and better palliative care, not assistance with suicide.
+Archbishop Peter Smith Chair Department of Christian responsibility and Citizenship 7th July 2015
Please write to our MP Lindsay Hoyle MP, House of Commons, London, SW1A OAA asking him to vote against the bill: Draft letter at foot of page if wanted
What will the Bill do? The Assisted Dying (No. 2) Bill is a Private Member’s Bill sponsored by Rob Marris MP. It would ‘enable competent adults who are terminally ill to choose to be provided with medically supervised assistance to end their own life’. That means it would licence doctors to supply lethal drugs to terminally ill patients to enable them to commit suicide.
What’s the law on this now? Suicide was decriminalised in British law in 1961 because it was recognised that people attempting to commit suicide needed care, support and often medical treatment because of depression, rather than a criminal conviction. The serious tragedy of suicide meant that it remained against the law to ‘encourage or assist’ another person’s suicide or attempted suicide. In 2010 the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) issued guidance about the factors that are taken into account in deciding whether to prosecute this offence. For example, prosecution is more likely if there is evidence of pressure having been brought to bear, or the assister had stood to gain from the suicide, or there was a duty of care for the person concerned. It is less likely if the assistance was given reluctantly and was ‘wholly motivated by compassion’. The law, which protects vulnerable people, is able to deter assisting suicide and, if necessary to deal with malicious assistance with suicide, while also having discretion not to press charges in tragic cases.
Why shouldn’t it be legal to assist suicide if the person wishing to die is old or disabled or ill? Every person’s life is equally worthy of respect and protection. Even if someone loses sight of the dignity and value of their life (whether through pain, suffering or loneliness), they remain valuable in themselves and a member of the human family. They deserve care, support and sometimes medical treatment for depression, not assistance with suicide. Neither the criminal law nor the DPP guidance distinguishes between suicide of young people who are physically-well and of someone who is old, disabled or ill. Indeed, as a society we rightly go to great lengths to prevent each and every suicide. In the words of the World Health Organisation, ‘every single life lost to suicide is one too many’.
How can we stand by while people die in pain? Don’t we have a duty to do something? We do have a duty to do something. The United Kingdom was a pioneer in the hospice movement and the development of palliative care but most people do not have access to a hospice. There is need for more resources to support improved palliative and end of life care. Most hospitals focus on curing people and sometimes ‘could do better’ when it comes to care of the dying. Over 95% of pain can be controlled with specialist help and as a last resort a person could at least be comfortably sedated.
What does the Church say about the value and dignity of dying people? In a message addressed to Catholics in Ireland, Scotland, England and Wales, Pope Francis said, ‘Even the weakest and most vulnerable, the sick, the old, the unborn and the poor, are masterpieces of God’s creation, made in his own image, destined to live for ever, and deserving of the utmost reverence and respect’. The Church teaches that life is a gift from God and supports high quality care for the dying and protection for the weak and vulnerable.
What does the medical profession have to say about physician assisted suicide? The British Medical Association, and the Medical Royal Colleges are strongly opposed to legalising physician–assisted suicide. A key principle of professional medical ethics, reflected in the criminal law, is that doctors should never intentionally shorten life. This principle, which dates from the ancient, pre-Christian, Hippocratic Oath, can be found today in the General Medical Council’s statement about the duties of a doctor, and in the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Geneva: doctors must show ‘the utmost respect for human life’.
Need life be preserved at all costs? Doctors may withdraw futile or burdensome treatments, or respect a patient’s refusal of treatment, or give much needed palliative treatment even if they foresee that, as an unintended side-effect, death may come sooner. In fact palliative drugs, properly administered, do not generally hasten death. Palliative care focuses not on cure but on care and ‘intends neither to hasten nor to postpone death’. It is no part of medicine to kill or to assist suicide but nor does it require doctors to preserve life at all costs.
Wouldn’t there be safeguards in any legalised system? Once you concede a principle and cross a line in ethics and law, it is wishful thinking to imagine that bad consequences can be averted merely by qualifications, conditions, or procedures. In the small number of jurisdictions where assisted suicide has been legalised or where it is not prosecuted under certain conditions (Holland, and a handful of states in the USA) there is ample evidence that the safeguards don’t work. For instance, some laws seek to restrict access to assisted suicide to terminally ill people with a specific prognosis. But prognosis of terminal illness is fraught with difficulty: terminally ill people often live for much longer than the predictions they are given when they are diagnosed – occasionally they even recover. Furthermore doctors often fail to spot clinical depression in people who would meet the legal requirements for assisted suicide. Each year the numbers dying by assisted suicide increase and the ‘safeguards’ are taken less and less seriously. For more information on this see the website of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre (www.bioethics.org.uk).
What should I do if I am concerned about the dangers of assisted suicide? If you are concerned about how legalising assisted suicide will put vulnerable people at risk, affect palliative care or encourage suicide please contact your local MP before the assisted Dying Bill is debated in the House of Commons on 11th September 2015. If you have personal experiences to share with them please do. MPs listen to their constituents and will want to hear about your concerns. You can send an e-mail to your MP via the Catholic Bishops’ Conference website www.catholicnews.org.uk/assisted-suicide This is a crucial opportunity to make your voice heard.
- Doctors don’t want assisted dying legislation
- The bill devalues the sick and elderly
- Assisted dying is not the answer to pain
- The Safeguards are not safe
- Vulnerable people will feel pressured to end their lives
- Assisted dying kills those who are not dying
- Assisted dying could become a cash-saving measure
There are leaflets in the narthex and information on the website with further details. Please send your letter before parliament rises for the summer recess on 21st July.
The Justice & Peace group thank you for your support, if you would like to receive information about this (or other campaigns) please complete the “letter writers form” available in the narthex.
Wikipedia definition of assisted suicide click here
Royal College A majority of those who contributed to the consultation thought that the College should maintain its position of opposition to a change in the law on assisted dying. click here to read more
Right to Life Falconer Redux: Oppose the Marris Bill!
by Peter D. Williams. The threat of assisted suicide has cropped up again, this time in the House of Commons. Right-to-lifers now have an opportunity to deal a serious defeat for the assisted death lobby, if the House of Commons decisively rejects their goals. click here to read more.
SPUC News, Vulnerable people threatened by Labour MP’s suicide proposal SPUC Pro-Life fears that vulnerable people will be adversely affected by the decision of Rob Marris, Labour MP for Wolverhampton South West, to propose an ‘Assisted Dying’ bill in the House of Commons. The bill is expected to single out people who are terminally ill or have disabilities as candidates for help to die.
A similar proposal was defeated on 27th May 2015 in the Scottish Parliament.
Commenting on the Mr Marris’s decision, John Deighan, of SPUC Scotland, said:
“We are disturbed that Rob Marris MP has chosen to prioritise the issue of assisted suicide. When properly examined assisted suicide is revealed as a grave danger to the vulnerable and disabled. It is not possible to safeguard effectively against coercion, and the so-called right to die easily becomes a duty to die. Establishing laws which endorse the view that some people are better off dead creates a regime which endangers the weakest members of society. We should maintain equal protection for the rights of those who are vulnerable.
“For reasons such as these Scottish politicians recently rejected assisted suicide proposals in considerable numbers. We call on Members of Parliament to do likewise with this proposal,” concluded Mr Deighan.
For further information contact: John Deighan Chief Executive Officer SPUC Scotland TEL: 0141 221 2094 MOBILE: 0780 273 9265
Or
Paul Tulley at SPUC HQ TEL: 020 7091 7091 EMAIL: political@spuc.org.uk. click here for further info
Draft Letter to MP
MP
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Dear I am contacting you regarding Rob Marris MP’s Private Member’s Bill on Assisted Dying which is due to have its second reading in the House of Commons on Friday 11th September. If passed, this Bill will have a profoundly negative impact on some of the most vulnerable people in our society. As my Member of Parliament, I hope that you will attend the debate and vote against the Bill at its second reading. I would be very grateful if you could let me how you intend to vote on this important matter and how you have taken my views into account. I look forward to hearing from you in due course. Yours sincerely
Assisted Suicide
Assisted Suicide
Assisted Suicide – Statement for the Catholic Press from Archbishop Smith. Very many people of all faiths and none will be concerned about a Bill to legalise Assisted Suicide in England and Wales which will be debated in the House of Commons on 11th September 2015. This private members Bill, introduced by Rob Marris MP, will have a free vote and it is important that people make their views known to their own MP ahead of this extremely important debate. I strongly urge all Catholics to contact their own MP as soon as possible to express their concern about the dangerous impact which such a Bill would have on the most vulnerable people. MPs do listen to their own constituents. What is needed is more and better palliative care, not assistance with suicide.
+Archbishop Peter Smith Chair Department of Christian responsibility and Citizenship 7th July 2015
Please write to our MP Lindsay Hoyle MP, House of Commons, London, SW1A OAA asking him to vote against the bill: Draft letter at foot of page if wanted
What will the Bill do? The Assisted Dying (No. 2) Bill is a Private Member’s Bill sponsored by Rob Marris MP. It would ‘enable competent adults who are terminally ill to choose to be provided with medically supervised assistance to end their own life’. That means it would licence doctors to supply lethal drugs to terminally ill patients to enable them to commit suicide.
What’s the law on this now? Suicide was decriminalised in British law in 1961 because it was recognised that people attempting to commit suicide needed care, support and often medical treatment because of depression, rather than a criminal conviction. The serious tragedy of suicide meant that it remained against the law to ‘encourage or assist’ another person’s suicide or attempted suicide. In 2010 the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) issued guidance about the factors that are taken into account in deciding whether to prosecute this offence. For example, prosecution is more likely if there is evidence of pressure having been brought to bear, or the assister had stood to gain from the suicide, or there was a duty of care for the person concerned. It is less likely if the assistance was given reluctantly and was ‘wholly motivated by compassion’. The law, which protects vulnerable people, is able to deter assisting suicide and, if necessary to deal with malicious assistance with suicide, while also having discretion not to press charges in tragic cases.
Why shouldn’t it be legal to assist suicide if the person wishing to die is old or disabled or ill? Every person’s life is equally worthy of respect and protection. Even if someone loses sight of the dignity and value of their life (whether through pain, suffering or loneliness), they remain valuable in themselves and a member of the human family. They deserve care, support and sometimes medical treatment for depression, not assistance with suicide. Neither the criminal law nor the DPP guidance distinguishes between suicide of young people who are physically-well and of someone who is old, disabled or ill. Indeed, as a society we rightly go to great lengths to prevent each and every suicide. In the words of the World Health Organisation, ‘every single life lost to suicide is one too many’.
How can we stand by while people die in pain? Don’t we have a duty to do something? We do have a duty to do something. The United Kingdom was a pioneer in the hospice movement and the development of palliative care but most people do not have access to a hospice. There is need for more resources to support improved palliative and end of life care. Most hospitals focus on curing people and sometimes ‘could do better’ when it comes to care of the dying. Over 95% of pain can be controlled with specialist help and as a last resort a person could at least be comfortably sedated.
What does the Church say about the value and dignity of dying people? In a message addressed to Catholics in Ireland, Scotland, England and Wales, Pope Francis said, ‘Even the weakest and most vulnerable, the sick, the old, the unborn and the poor, are masterpieces of God’s creation, made in his own image, destined to live for ever, and deserving of the utmost reverence and respect’. The Church teaches that life is a gift from God and supports high quality care for the dying and protection for the weak and vulnerable.
What does the medical profession have to say about physician assisted suicide? The British Medical Association, and the Medical Royal Colleges are strongly opposed to legalising physician–assisted suicide. A key principle of professional medical ethics, reflected in the criminal law, is that doctors should never intentionally shorten life. This principle, which dates from the ancient, pre-Christian, Hippocratic Oath, can be found today in the General Medical Council’s statement about the duties of a doctor, and in the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Geneva: doctors must show ‘the utmost respect for human life’.
Need life be preserved at all costs? Doctors may withdraw futile or burdensome treatments, or respect a patient’s refusal of treatment, or give much needed palliative treatment even if they foresee that, as an unintended side-effect, death may come sooner. In fact palliative drugs, properly administered, do not generally hasten death. Palliative care focuses not on cure but on care and ‘intends neither to hasten nor to postpone death’. It is no part of medicine to kill or to assist suicide but nor does it require doctors to preserve life at all costs.
Wouldn’t there be safeguards in any legalised system? Once you concede a principle and cross a line in ethics and law, it is wishful thinking to imagine that bad consequences can be averted merely by qualifications, conditions, or procedures. In the small number of jurisdictions where assisted suicide has been legalised or where it is not prosecuted under certain conditions (Holland, and a handful of states in the USA) there is ample evidence that the safeguards don’t work. For instance, some laws seek to restrict access to assisted suicide to terminally ill people with a specific prognosis. But prognosis of terminal illness is fraught with difficulty: terminally ill people often live for much longer than the predictions they are given when they are diagnosed – occasionally they even recover. Furthermore doctors often fail to spot clinical depression in people who would meet the legal requirements for assisted suicide. Each year the numbers dying by assisted suicide increase and the ‘safeguards’ are taken less and less seriously. For more information on this see the website of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre (www.bioethics.org.uk).
What should I do if I am concerned about the dangers of assisted suicide? If you are concerned about how legalising assisted suicide will put vulnerable people at risk, affect palliative care or encourage suicide please contact your local MP before the assisted Dying Bill is debated in the House of Commons on 11th September 2015. If you have personal experiences to share with them please do. MPs listen to their constituents and will want to hear about your concerns. You can send an e-mail to your MP via the Catholic Bishops’ Conference website www.catholicnews.org.uk/assisted-suicide This is a crucial opportunity to make your voice heard.
There are leaflets in the narthex and information on the website with further details. Please send your letter before parliament rises for the summer recess on 21st July.
The Justice & Peace group thank you for your support, if you would like to receive information about this (or other campaigns) please complete the “letter writers form” available in the narthex.
Wikipedia definition of assisted suicide click here
Royal College A majority of those who contributed to the consultation thought that the College should maintain its position of opposition to a change in the law on assisted dying. click here to read more
Right to Life Falconer Redux: Oppose the Marris Bill!
by Peter D. Williams. The threat of assisted suicide has cropped up again, this time in the House of Commons. Right-to-lifers now have an opportunity to deal a serious defeat for the assisted death lobby, if the House of Commons decisively rejects their goals. click here to read more.
SPUC News, Vulnerable people threatened by Labour MP’s suicide proposal SPUC Pro-Life fears that vulnerable people will be adversely affected by the decision of Rob Marris, Labour MP for Wolverhampton South West, to propose an ‘Assisted Dying’ bill in the House of Commons. The bill is expected to single out people who are terminally ill or have disabilities as candidates for help to die.
A similar proposal was defeated on 27th May 2015 in the Scottish Parliament.
Commenting on the Mr Marris’s decision, John Deighan, of SPUC Scotland, said:
“We are disturbed that Rob Marris MP has chosen to prioritise the issue of assisted suicide. When properly examined assisted suicide is revealed as a grave danger to the vulnerable and disabled. It is not possible to safeguard effectively against coercion, and the so-called right to die easily becomes a duty to die. Establishing laws which endorse the view that some people are better off dead creates a regime which endangers the weakest members of society. We should maintain equal protection for the rights of those who are vulnerable.
“For reasons such as these Scottish politicians recently rejected assisted suicide proposals in considerable numbers. We call on Members of Parliament to do likewise with this proposal,” concluded Mr Deighan.
For further information contact: John Deighan Chief Executive Officer SPUC Scotland TEL: 0141 221 2094 MOBILE: 0780 273 9265
Or
Paul Tulley at SPUC HQ TEL: 020 7091 7091 EMAIL: political@spuc.org.uk. click here for further info
Draft Letter to MP
MP
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Dear I am contacting you regarding Rob Marris MP’s Private Member’s Bill on Assisted Dying which is due to have its second reading in the House of Commons on Friday 11th September. If passed, this Bill will have a profoundly negative impact on some of the most vulnerable people in our society. As my Member of Parliament, I hope that you will attend the debate and vote against the Bill at its second reading. I would be very grateful if you could let me how you intend to vote on this important matter and how you have taken my views into account. I look forward to hearing from you in due course. Yours sincerely